mohammad reza shirzadi; mohamad ziyaii; hadi rezghi shirsavar; sodabeh jalili
Abstract
The aim of the this paper is to examine ranking of the current situation of the meritocracy model components for managers of the research and training centers of Ministry of Agriculture Jahad. The type of present study was quantitative, application, Field, non-descriptive. The questionnaire consists ...
Read More
The aim of the this paper is to examine ranking of the current situation of the meritocracy model components for managers of the research and training centers of Ministry of Agriculture Jahad. The type of present study was quantitative, application, Field, non-descriptive. The questionnaire consists of 69 type and 11 Components with the Cronbach's alpha 0/808, reliability 0/846. validity that, it is confirm by 19 experts in the first level of main research and assigned to 35 experts of the research and training agriculture institute. It is surveyed based on component ranking in current situation by using PLS software. The current mode ranking was included crisis management 4, empowerment 9, leadership and teamwork 6, science and knowledge management 7, entrepreneurship and development thought 11, ethics 1, critical and creative thinking 10, statesmanship 5, forth wave management thinking 8, system thinking 2, learning organization thinking 3. Finally, the statesmanship and forth wave management thinking components compared with definition in meritocracy model and determined that it has not proper situation. Therefore, the empowerment and excellence programs need to be set up, then promote more effective and knowledge-based components by ranking components, but it is done with a view of training priorities, to train future managers of relevant devices. According to ratings and needs of social outcomes, we will have more forward-looking and knowledgeable managers based on needs assessment in terms of social priorities, converting human resources to human capital, content formulation and outreach training in areas of the country, and the other hand meritocracy, fourth wave thinking, and politicized behavior. Adopting such policies requires that the higher education system, while adopting appropriate policy practices and patterns at the highest levels of decision-making, consider both the scientific standards and the political, social, economic, and cultural conditions of society.
mohammad reza shirzadi; muhamad sadegh Ziyaii; Hadi Shirsavar; Sodabeh Jalili
Abstract
The present study aims to developing the assigned complementary model, the selection and appointment based on the merit of the managers of the centers affiliated to the applied higher education institution of the Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture, and desirable mode ranking is performed due to attitude ...
Read More
The present study aims to developing the assigned complementary model, the selection and appointment based on the merit of the managers of the centers affiliated to the applied higher education institution of the Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture, and desirable mode ranking is performed due to attitude importance of the institution managers to cultivation of educated experts in agricultural industry. This combination (quantitative, qualitative), application, field, descriptive, non-descriptive study along with theoretical saturation is interviewed by19experts and then all the items approved by experts based on the adjusting yes or no questions. The initial questionnaire was set and distributed among180experts.After collecting data obtained KMO=%86. Finally,11components have ability to determine %87/88 meritocracy variance. Final questionnaire was provided 35 interacting participants by manager of the centers.The results of Kolmogorov-Smirnov test have more suitable condition than the significant effect, all Cronbach alpha variables more than0.7and mean variance more than 0.5.Therefore, the convergent validity of the variables accepted with CR>AVE. Using PLS output, the components of meritocracy and desirability mode rankings was considered and factor load determined. The desirability status rankings were included crisis management8,empowerment10,leadership and teamwork1, science& knowledge of management5,entrepreneurship and development thought 6,ethics9, critical and creative thinking 4, statesmanship 7,fourth wave management thinking11, system thinking3,learning organization thinking2.The finding of this study was considering exclusive model of manager’s meritocracy in centers and ranking of items. For the first time introduced two concept of meritocracy components, the first one was statemanship and the other was fourth wave attitude
