Strategies for Physical Environment Improvement of Horticultural Education for Students with Special Needs

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Former Ph.D. Student, Tarbiat Modares University (TMU), College of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Tehran, Iran.

2 Professor, Tarbiat Modares University (TMU), College of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Tehran, Iran.

3 Associate Professor of Agricultural Extension and Education Department of Agricultural Extension and Education College of Agriculture Tarbiat Modares University (TMU) Tehran, Iran

Abstract

This study aimed to identify and assess classrooms’ physical environment improvement strategies by horticultural education teachers to work with students with special needs in Iran. This first phase was conducted used a modified Delphi technique. The specialized Delphi team consisted of gardening education teachers in the Special Education Organization of Iran (31 teachers). The outcome of this phase of the study was 27 strategies to improve the physical environment of classes. Results showed that all respondents agree that these strategies include: repeat and practice of the teaching procedure (two or three times orally) ; more practical training, putting disabled students beside students of the border, assignment of students to small practical projects meant to be fully accomplished. It seems that, before starting any teaching course, the agriculture teacher must comprehend the field of exceptional teaching and understand the needs of students with special needs in order to be able of providing proper feedbacks and a good strategy. The second phase was conducted a survey study. The population consisted of 80 horticultural teachers in Special Education Organization of Iran. According to finding, 34.8% of gardening education teachers evaluated their strategies at a very high level, 45.5% at a high level, and 19.7% at a moderate level. In addition, comprehension of the classrooms’ physical environment improvement strategies by the teachers brings about long-term consistency of agricultural teaching programs in exceptional schools.

Keywords

References

 
Afroz, A. (2012). Introduction to Psychologyand Education of Exceptional Children. Tehran: Publications Excellence Tehran University.
Alikhani Dadoukolaei, M., Chizari, M., Bijani, M., (2017). Instructional Strategies of Iran Agricultural Education Teachers When Working with Students with Special Needs. 23rd European Seminar on Extension (and) Education (ESEE 2017), Transformative Learning: New Directions in Agricultural Extension and Education, 4-7 July 2017, At: Chania, Greece.
Andreasen, R. J., Seevers, B. S., Dormody, T. J. & VanLeeuwen, D. M. (2007). Training Needs of New Mexico Agricultural Education Teachers related to Incolusion of with Students with Special Needs. Journal of Agricultural Education, 48 (4), 117 – 129. DOI: 10.5032/jae. 2007.04117.
Calvert, S. C. (2012). Students with Special Needs and Career and Technical Education. Lynchburg College. Journal of Special Education, 7, 1-21.http://www.lynchburg.edu/wp-content/uploads/volume-7-2012/CalvertSC-Students-Special-Needs-Career-Tech-Ed. pdf.
Clason, D. L. & Dormody, T. J. (1994). Analyzing data measured by individual Likert-type items. Journal of Agricultural Education, 35 (4), 31-35.
Dalkey, N. C. (1969). The Delphi method: An experimental study of group opinion. Santa Monica: The Rand Corporation.
Delp, P., Thesen, A., Motiwalla, J., & Seshadri, N. (1977). Delphi: System tools for project planning. Columbus, Ohio: National Center for Research in Vocational Education.
Easterly, R. G. and Myers, B. E. (2011). Inquiry–Based Instruction for Students with Special Needs in School Based Agricultural Education. Journal of Agricultural Education, 52 (2), 36–46. DOI: 10.5032/jae. 2011.02036.
Gaona, J. (2004). The effects of the No Child Left behind Act on career and technical education: Implications for students with special needs. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 41 (2), 43-57. Retrieved from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JITE/v41n2/gaona.
Harvey, M. W. (2001). Comparisons of postsecondary transitional outcomes between students with and without disabilities b secondary vocational education participation: Findings from the National Longitudinal Transitional Study. Career Development of Exceptional Individuals, 25, 99-121.
Heward, W. L. (2003). Exceptional children: An introduction to special education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Hopps, W. N. (2002). A Comparison of Special and Regular Education Teachers’ Knowledge of Laws and Policies on Inclusion. Ph. D. Dissertation) No publishid (. The South Carolina State University. Available at.
Hsu Ch, Sandford BA. (2008). The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. [Cite 2008 Oct 19]. Available from: http://pareonline.net/pdf/v12n10.pdf.
Kaiser, G., Sigrid Blömeke., Johannes König., Andreas Busse., Martina Döhrmann, and Jessica Hoth. (2017). Professional competencies of (prospective) mathematics teachers-cognitive versus situated approaches. Educ Stud Math, 94, 161–182. DOI 10.1007/s10649-016-9713-8.
Keeney S, Hasson F, McKenna HP. (2001). A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing. Int J Nurs Stud 2001 Apr; 38 (2), 195-200.
Kessell, J., Lawver, D., Davis, C., & Fraze, S. (2005). What our teachers should know: A review of special education law and recognized disabilities that are accommodated. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Western Region Agricultural Education Conference.
McLeskey J., Waldron, N. L., So, T. H., Swanson, K. and Loveland, T (2001). Perspectives of teachers toward inclusive school programs. Teacher Education and Special Education, 24 (2), 108-115.
Moore, C. M. (1987). Group techniques for idea building. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Namdar. R., and Sadighi. H. (2013). Investigation of major challenges of rural development in Iran utilizing Delphi technique. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology (JAST). 15, 445- 455.
Public Law 101-476. (1990). Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Federal Register, 54, 35210-35271.
Public Law 94-142. (1975). Federal Register, 42, 42474-42518.
Richardson, J. M., & Washburn, S. (2006, May). Strategies employed by North Carolina agriculture teachers in serving students with mild to moderate learning disabilities. Paper presented at the American Association for Agricultural Education National Research Conference, Charlotte, NC.
Rojewski, J & Gregg, N. (2011). Career choice patterns and behaviors of work-bound youth with high incidence disabilities. In J. M. Kauffman & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.), Handbook of Special Education (pp. 584-593). New York, New York: Routledge.
Shawn, S. K. (2009). Identifying Confidence Levels and Instructional Strategies of High School Agriculture Education Teachers When Working with Students with Special Needs. Ph. D. Dissertation) No publishid (., The North Carolina State University.
Stair, Kristin S., Gary E. Moore, Beth Wilson, Barry Croom, K. S. U. Jayaratne, (2010). Identifying Confidence Levels and Instructional Strategies of High School Agricultural Education Teachers When Working with Students with Special Needs. Journal of Agricultural Education, 51 (2), 90 – 101.
Stufflebeam, D. L., McCormick, C. H., Binkerhoff, R. O., & Nelson, C. O. (1985). Conducting educational needs assessments. Boston: Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing.
United States Department of Education (2007). The condition of education. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics