Skill Enrichment of Curriculum Development in Iranian Higher Agricultural Education System: case of the Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Associate Professor, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources

10.22092/jaear.2022.128996

Abstract

Improving the employability of university graduates entails enhancement of skill training in curriculum development. Skill enrichment to the curriculum development in the agricultural higher education system implicates a systemic approach to understand the relevant requirements. The aim of this research was to develop a set of strategies and guidelines for the skill enrichment of the curriculum development in the agricultural higher education system. This research was carried out by qualitative approach using the focus group method. The research tool was a semi-structured interview with a group of the stakeholders of skill training in the higher agricultural education system (case of the Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources) who were selected by purposive sampling (n=12). In order to collect data in this research, first, by semi-structured interview, the narrative of the research participants was collected. Then, using qualitative content analysis of the narratives, key propositions were extracted, a focus group was formed and a facilitated group interview was conducted to find the components and indicators of the integration of skill training in curriculum development in the agricultural higher education system. According to the research findings, a model including five components was articulated: strategic principles of skill development, educational development measures with a skill training approach in three stages (design, implementation and evaluation), and finally, infrastructure development mechanisms for supporting skill training in the higher agricultural education system. As key implication of this research, reaching entrepreneurial learning as value add of university skill training requires which skill training, beyond an extracurricular activity, embedded in the process of university curriculum development.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  • Azizan, M. T., Mellon, N., Ramli, R. M., and Yusup, S. (2018). Improving teamwork skills and enhancing deep learning via development of board game using cooperative learning method in Reaction Engineering course. Education for Chemical Engineers, 22:1-13.‏
  • Bergman, J.Z., Westerman, J. W., Bergman, S. M., Westerman, J. and Daly, J. P. (2013). Narcissism, materialism, and environmental ethics in business students. Journal of Management Education, 38: 489-510.
  • Bruffee, K. A. (1984). Collaborative learning and the" conversation of mankind". College English, 46(7): 635-652.‏
  • Clancy A., Cullen J.G., Hood A., and McGuinness C. (2021). Teaching Perspectives on Experiential Learning in Large Classes. Journal of Management Education; 45(5):685-689.
  • Foldnes, N. (2016). The flipped classroom and cooperative learning: Evidence from a randomised experiment. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(1): 39-49.‏
  • Hill, R., Woodward, M., and Arthur, A. (2020). Collaborative Learning in Practice (CLIP): Evaluation of a new approach to clinical learning. Nurse Education Today, 85, 104295.
  • ‏Lin, Z. C. (2013). Comparison of technology-based cooperative learning with technology-based individual learning in enhancing fundamental nursing proficiency. Nurse Education Today, 33(5): 546-551.‏
  • O’reilly, M. and Parker, N. (2013). Unsatisfactory Saturation’: a critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qualitative research, 13(2):190-197.
  • Ochieng, N.T., Wilson, K., Derrick, C.J., Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9: 20– 32.
  • Parris, D. L. and McInnis-Bowers, C. (2017). Business not as usual: Developing socially conscious entrepreneurs and intrapreneurs. Journal of Management Education, 41(5): 687-726.
  • Persons, O. (2012). Incorporating corporate social responsibility and sustainability into business course: A shared experience. Journal of Education for Business, 87: 63-72.
  • Perusso A, van der Sijde P, Leal R, Blankesteijn M. (2021). The Effectiveness and Impact of Action Learning on Business Graduates’ Professional Practice. Journal of Management Education, 45(2):177-205.
  • Rasmussen, E. A., and Sørheim, R. (2006). Action-based entrepreneurship education. Technovation, 26 (2): 185–194.
  • Ronstadt, R. (1988) ‘The Corridor Principle. Journal of Business Venturing, 3(1):31-40.
  • Tadesse, T., Gillies, R. M., and Manathunga, C. (2020). Shifting the instructional paradigm in higher education classrooms in Ethiopia: What happens when we use cooperative learning pedagogies more seriously? International Journal of Educational Research, 99, 101509.‏
  • Tekarslan, E. and Erden, N. S. (2014). A review of business education around the globe: Future transitions. Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 6 (2): 49-64.
  • Thomas, H. Lee, M. Thomas, L. and Wilson, A. (2014). Securing the future of business education: Competitive destruction or constructive innovation? Bingley, England: Emerald.
  • Warfa, A. R. M. (2016). Using cooperative learning to teach chemistry: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(2): 248-255.
  • Yusuf, Q., Jusoh, Z., and Yusuf, Y. Q. (2019). Cooperative Learning Strategies to Enhance Writing Skills among Second Language Learners. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1):1399-1412.‏
Journal of Agricultural Education Administration Research
Volume 14, Issue 62 - Serial Number 62
December 2022
Pages 97-123

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics