Knowledge Mapping of Water Governance: Introduction of a New Approach for Managing Agricultural Research

Azami, Mosa; Pouya, Mehrdad

doi:10.22092/jaear.2020.128026.1657

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

mosa azami ¹
Mehrdad Pouya ²

¹ Associate professor, Agricultural Extension and Education Dept., Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran.

² PhD Student on Agricultural Development, Agricultural Extension and Education Dept., Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.22092/jaear.2020.128026.1657

Abstract

Although publications of water governance reports have rapidly been increasing recently, no researches utilized knowledge and word co-occurrence mapping as a novel methodology. The Knowledge map reveals major scientific nodes and trends of the study area with its strengths and weaknesses; so it was conducted through focusing on the topic of water governance as a new area of knowledge. After extracting and processing documents, retrieved by searching water AND governance, and indexed in the Scopus site- as the most comprehensive indexing site- the data were analyzed using the VOSwiever-1.6.9 software including network, overlay and density visualizations. Out of over 7000 documents and 14000 authors who published on the subject matter up to 2019, the US, the Netherlands and Australia were found to have published the highest number of the documents. Meanwhile, China and India ranked to the end of the ten-nation list. Not only Claudia Pahl-Wostl and Joyeeta Gupta received the most citations; but also their clusters showed to have the highest density scores as well. The word co-occurrence network revealed the following five research clusters: collective action, adaptation, groundwater, experience; capacity, agriculture, climate, drought, and resilience; evidence, participation, integrated management, technology, and implementation; human rights, energy, sanitation, solutions, and environment; and conflicts, collaboration, evaluation, politics, and power. Knowledge mapping is recommended for offering a holistic insight regarding the subject matter under study to future agricultural extension education researchers.

Keywords

References

Araral, E. and Wang, Y. (2013). Water Governance 2.0: A review and Second generation research agenda. Water Resources Management, 27 (11): 3945-3957.

Braga, B; Chartres, C; Cosgrove, W. J. da Cunha, L. V; Gleick, P. H; Kabat, P; Ait Kadi, M; Loucks, D. P; Lundqvist, J; Narain, S; and Xia, J. (2014). Water and the Future of Humanity, Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation, Avenide de Berna. 45 A: 1067-001 Lisbon, Portugal.

Borner, K., and Polley, D. E. (2014). Visual insights: A practical guide to making sense of data. MIT Press.

Borner, K., Theriault, T. N., and Boyack, K. W. (2015). Mapping science introduction: Past, present and future. Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 41 (2), 12-16.

Brouwer, S. (2015). Policy Entrepreneurs in Water Governance. London: Springer.

Durán-Sánchez, A., Del Río-Rama, M. D. L., Álvarez-García, J., and Castellano-Álvarez, F. J. (2019). Scientific Coverage in Water Governance: Systematic Analysis. Water, 11 (1), 177. DOI: 10.3390/w11010177.

Engin, K., Tran, M., Connor, R., Uhlenbrook, S. (2018). The United Nations world water development report 2018: nature-based solutions for water; facts and figures. Paris: UNESCO.

GATT, K. (2016). Social network analysis as a tool for improved water governance in Malta. International Journal of Society Systems Science, 8 (2): 131-154.

Gosling, S. N.; Arnell, N. W. (2016) a global assessment of the impact of climate change on water scarcity. Clim. Chang. 134, 371–385. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10584-013-0853-x.

Green, O., Garmestani, A., van Rijswick, H., and Keessen, A. (2013). EU water governance: striking the right balance between regulatory flexibility and enforcement? Ecology and Society, 18 (2). http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-05357-180210.

Grigg, N. S. (2016). Integrator water resources management: an interdisciplinary approach. Palgrave Macmillan.

Huppert, W., Fischer, A., Petersen, L., and Feldko, C. (2007). Sustainable Governance of Natural Resources and Institutional Change – an Analytical Framework. In: Public Administration and Development, Volume: 137, Issue: 2, Publisher: JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD, Pages: 123-137.

Kuzdas, C., Weik, A., Warner, B., Vignola, R. and Morataya, R. (2014). Sustainability appraisal of water governance regimes: The Case of Guanacaste, Costa Rica. Environmental Management, 54 (2): 205-222.

Lane, A., Norton, M., and Ryan, S. (2017). Water Resources: A New Water Architecture. Chicehster: John Wiley & Sons.

Lukasiewicz, A., Davidson, P., Syme, G. J, and Bowmer, K. H. (2013). How the social construction of the environment effects people’s reaction to water policy. Journal of Environment Management, Volume 20. Issue 3: 179-192.

Molden, D. (2004). Phases of River Basin Development: the Need for Adaptive Institutions, in M. Svendsen, ed., Irrigation and River Basin Management: options for governance and institutions (Cambridge, Mass: CABI).

Pahl-Wostl, C. (2015). Water Governance in the Face of Global Change: From Understanding to Transformation. Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-21855-7_2.

. Pahl-Wostl, C (2017) An Evolutionary Perspective on Water Governance: From Understanding to Transformation” Water Resour Manage (2017) 31:2917–2932, DOI 10.1007/s11269-017-1727-1.

Pahl-Wostl, C.; Lebel, L.; Knieper, C.; Nikitina, E. (2012) from applying panaceas to mastering complexity: Toward adaptive water governance in river basins. Environ. Sci. Policy 2012, 23, 24–34. Https: //doi.org/10.1016/j. envsci. 2012.07.014.

Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a Literature review. Biological Conservation, 141 (10): 2417-2431.

Roger, P. and Hall, A. W. (2003). Effective Water Governance. Global Water Partnership.

Rowley J, Slack F (2004) Conducting a literature review. Manag Res News 27:31–39, https://doi. org/10.1108/01409170410784185.

Saimy, I. S. and Yusof, N. A. M. (2013). The Need for Better Water Policy and Governance Malaysia, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 81: 371-375.

Teisman, G. (2013). Water governance. International journal of water governance, 1 (12): 1-12.

Turrini. A., Cristofoli, D., Frosoni, F., and Nasi, G. (2010). Networking literature about determinants of network effectiveness. Public Administration, 88: 528-550.

Van Eck NJ, Waltman L (2018) VOSviewer manual.

Velasco-Muñoz, J. F., Aznar-Sánchez, J. A., Belmonte-Ureña, L. J., & López-Serrano, M. J. (2018). Advances in water use efficiency in agriculture: A bibliometric analysis. Water, 10 (4), 377.

Wiek, A., and Larson, K. L. (2012). Water, People, and Sustainability- a systems framework for analyzing and assessing water governance regimes. Water Resources Management, 26 (11), 3153-3171.

Xu, L., Gober, P., Wheater, H. S., & Kajikawa, Y. (2018). Reframing socio-hydrological research to include a social science perspective. Journal of hydrology, 563, 76-83.

Yong-Hak, J. (2013) Web of Science, Thomson Reuters. Available online: http://wokinfo.com/media/pdf/WoSFS_08_7050. Pdf (accessed on 1 October 2019.

Agricultural Education Administration Research

Knowledge Mapping of Water Governance: Introduction of a New Approach for Managing Agricultural Research

References

References

Volume 11, Issue 50 - Serial Number 50
December 2019
Pages 106-126

Knowledge Mapping of Water Governance: Introduction of a New Approach for Managing Agricultural Research

References

References

Volume 11, Issue 50 - Serial Number 50December 2019Pages 106-126

Volume 11, Issue 50 - Serial Number 50
December 2019
Pages 106-126