Agricultural Education Administration Research

Agricultural Education Administration Research

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Editorial Board

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Peer Review Process

Journal Metrics

The Accelerating Model for Academic Agricultural Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Growth from the Viewpoints of Startups Experts

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Prof., Department of Agricultural Extension & Education, Faculty of Agricultural Economics and Development, University of Tehran

2 PhD student of Agricultural Education, Faculty of Agricultural Economics and Development, University of Tehran

3 Prof., Department of Agricultural Extension & Education, Faculty of Agricultural Economics and Development, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.

4 Assistant Prof., Department of Agricultural Extension & Education, Faculty of Agricultural Economics and Development, University of Tehran

5 Assistant Prof., of Entrepreneurship and Rural Development, Faculty of Agricultural, Ilam University

Abstract

The importance of startups in the field of agriculture is more evident than ever. Nevertheless, in order for this important matter to be realized, providing the environment and conditions or ecosystem for startups is essential. Considering the lack of experience of the agriculture sector of Iran for creating such ecosystems, it is necessary to build on the experiences of pioneering entrepreneurial sectors and identify the components of agricultural startup ecosystems. This paper aims to present the accelerating model for academic entrepreneurial ecosystem growth based on Isenberg’s model, with an emphasis on the agricultural higher education from the viewpoints of startups experts. This applied research was carried out using survey method. The statistical population of the study consisted of 1800 startup experts in Iran. Using the Cochran formula, a sample comprising 286 individuals was selected by simple random sampling. To assess the validity of the research tool a divergent validity method was utilized, the amount of which for the constructs under study was above AVE ≥ 0.5 and acceptable. In order to determine the reliability, the combined reliability method was used, the amount of which for the constructs under study was above CR ≥ 0.6 and acceptable. The amount of the ordinal theta coefficient for the constructs was calculated to be above θ ≥ 0.7. In order to analyze the data, exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were used. Then according to the measurement model, the factors of the accelerating model for academic entrepreneurial ecosystem growth include enhancing the private sector, supporting productive entrepreneurship, developing entrepreneurship culture, entrepreneurial thinking, paying attention the role of consultants, providing the physical space, the ecosystem of training agricultural business skills, network building, the political image of the country’s market, and access to financial resources.

Keywords

References
Brown, R., and Mason, C. (2017). Looking inside the spiky bits: a critical review and conceptualization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Bus Econ, 49,11–30.
Brush, G. (2014). Exploring the Concept of an Entrepreneurship Education Ecosystem Innovative Pathways for University Entrepreneurship in the 21st Century. Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship. Innovation & Economic Growth, 24 (1), 25-39.
Dickson, P. H., Solomon, G. T., and Weaver, K. M. (2008). Entrepreneurial selection and success: does education matter?. Journal of small business and enterprise development, 15 (2), 239-258.
Fetters, M., Greene, P. G., and Rice, M. P. (Eds.). (2010). The development of university-based entrepreneurship ecosystems: global practices. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class and how it’s transforming work, life, community andeveryday life (Paperback Ed.).
Forfas, F. (2009). Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: South West Ireland, rethinking entrepreneurship. Baseline Data and Analysis. South West Ireland. Dublin. 26. Available at: www. forfas. ie.
Fu, E., and Hsia, T. (2017). Universities and Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: Elements of the Stanford-Silicon Valley Success. From http://www. kauffmanfellows. org/journal_posts/ universities-and-entrepreneurial-ecosystems-stanfordsilicon-valley-success.
Guerrero Cano, M. (2007). Entrepreneurial universities: The case of the autonomous university of Barcelona. Research work at the Autonomous University of Barcelona.
Hejazi, Y., Hashemi, S. M., and Malek Mohammadi, E. (2008). Iranian agricultural graduates and agri-business ventures. American Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Science, 4 (3), 311-317.
Isenberg, D. (2010). How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution. Harvard Business Review.
Isenberg, D. (2011). The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. Presentation at the Institute of International and European Affairs, May 12, 2011, Dublin Ireland. Available on line at http://entrepreneurialrevolution.com/. 1-32.
Isenberg, D (2011a) The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economy policy principles for cultivating entrepreneurship, Babson Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Project, Babson College, Babson Park: MA.
Kantis, H. D., and Federico, J. S. (2012). Entrepreneurial ecosystems in Latin America: the role of policies. In International research and policy roundtable (Kauffman Foundation). Liverpool: UK.
Ketikidis, P H., Ververidis, Y, and Kefalas, P. (2012). An Entrepreneurial Model for Internationalisation of Higher Education: The Case of City College, an International Faculty of the University of Sheffield. Proceedings of the Conference on Entrepreneurial Universities.
Lee, S. M., and Peterson, S. J. (2000). Culture, entrepreneurial orientation, and global competitiveness. Journal of world business, 35 (4), 401-416.
Martin, R., and Sunley, P. (2003). Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea?. Journal of Economic Geography, 3 (1), 5–35.
Matlay, H. (2008). The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial outcomes. Journal of small business and enterprise development, 15 (2), 382-396.
Miller, D. J., and Acs, Z. J. (2017). The campus as entrepreneurial ecosystem: the University of Chicago. Small Business Economics, 49 (1), 75-95.
Morris, M. H., Shirokova, G., and Tsukanova, T. (2017). Student entrepreneurship and the universityecosystem: a multi-country empirical exploration. European Journal of International Management, 11 (1), 65-85.
Morris, M. H., Kuratko, D. F., and Cornwall, J. R. (2013). Entrepreneurship programs and the modern university. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Napier, G., and Hansen, C. (2011) Ecosystems for Young Scaleable Firms, FORA Group.
Philpott K., Dooley L., Caroline O’Reilly, and Lupton G., (2011), The entrepreneurial university: Examining the underlying academic tensions. Technovation, 31, 161–170.
Rideout, E. C., and Gray, D. O. (2013). Does entrepreneurship education really work? A review and methodological critique of the empirical literature on the effects of university‐ based entrepreneurship education. Journal of Small Business Management, 51 (3), 329-351.
Siegel, D. S., Veugelers, R., and Wright, M. (2007). Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: performance and policy implications. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23 (4), 640–660.
Stam, E., and Spigel, B. (2016). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems.. In R. Blackburn, D. De Clercq, J. Heinonen, & Z. Wang (Eds.), Handbook for Entrepreneurship and Small Business. London, UK: Sage.
Toledano, N., and Urbano, D. (2008). Promoting entrepreneurial mindsets at universities: a case study in the South of Spain. European Journal of International Management, 2 (4), 382-399.
WEF (World Economic Forum). (2014). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems around the Globe and Early-Stage Company Growth Dynamics, World Economic Forum, Geneva, Switzerland.
Yusof, M., M. S. Siddiq, M. S., and Nor, L. M. (2012). Internal factors of academic entrepreneurship: The case of four Malaysian Public Research Universities. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management, and Innovation, 8 (1), 84–115.
Agricultural Education Administration Research
Volume 11, Issue 50 - Serial Number 50
December 2019
Pages 39-59
Files
Share
How to cite
Statistics