The Impact of Agricultural Extension Site Approach on Optimizing Agricultural Input Consumption and increasing the yield of dominant products in Hamedan Province, Iran

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Former M.Sc. Student, Department of Agricultural Extension & Education, College of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University (TMU), Tehran, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Extension & Education, College of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University (TMU), Tehran, Iran.

3 Associate Professor of Agricultural Extension and Education Department of Agricultural Extension and Education College of Agriculture Tarbiat Modares University (TMU) Tehran, Iran

4 Associate Professor, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Implementation of extension sites approach is one of the activities for empowering the farmers. The aims of extension site approach were increasing in quality and quantity and sustainable production of agricultural products. The purpose of this study was to compare consumption of inputs in five crops of irrigated wheat, rain fed wheat, rapeseed, sugar beet and potato before and after implementation of extension sites approach in Hamedan province in 2018-2019. This research is applied in term of purpose, is survey in term of collecting data, is quasi-experimental in term of controlling variables and is ex-post facto research in term of analyzing the data. The statistical population included 78 extension sites approach in Hamedan province. For selecting the sample, first of all five cities of Kabudar Ahang (north), Hamedan (center), Nahavand (south), Famenin (east), and Asadabad (west) selected from different geographical situation. The number of extension sites approach were 43 in these cities. Using Krejcie and Morgan’s sampling table, 36 sites selected as sample and unit of analysis (n=36). Following that 142 main and functional farmers were selected and studied using random sampling method. The results of t- test showed that the consumption of inputs decreased after the implementation of extension sites approach and there were differences between consumption of inputs before and after running model site, except for human labor force. In addition, farmer’s income and performance per unit area have increased since the extension site was launched.

Keywords


Adejo, P. E., Okwu, O. J., & Ibrahim, M. K. (2012). Challenges and Prospects of Privatization of Agricultural Extension Service Delivery in Nigeria. Journal of agricultural extension and rural development, 4(3), 63-68.
Anandajayasekeram, P., Davis, K. E., & Workneh, S. (2007). Farmer Field Schools: An Alternative to Existing Extension Systems? Experience from Eastern and Southern Africa. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education, 14(1), 81-93.‏
Akinnagbe, OM., and Ajayi, AR. (2010). Challenges of Farmer-led Extension Approaches in Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development, 4 (3): 63-68.
Braun, A. R., Graham T., and Fernandez, M. (2000). Farmer Field Schools and Local Agricultural Research Committees: Complementary Platforms for Integrated Decision Making In Sustainable Agriculture. Agriculture Research and Extension Network Paper No.105, Overseas
Brower, F. (2004). Sustaining Agriculture and the Rural Environment (Governance, Policy and Multifunctional). UK Edward Edgar Publishing Limited.
Davis, M. (2006). City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles (New Edition). Verso Books.
Groeneweg, J. G., Huygen, F. J., Heijmans-Antonissen, C., Niehof, S., & Zijlstra, F. J. (2006). Increased Endothelin-1 and Diminished Nitric Oxide Levels in Blister Fluids of Patients with Intermediate Cold Type Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type 1. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, ،7 (1): 91-103.
Karbasioun, M. (2007). Towards a Competency Profile for the Role of Instruction of Agricultural Extension Professionals in Esfahan, Unpublished PhD Thesis, Wageningen University.
  Khisa, G. S., & Heinemann, E. (2005). Farmer Empowerment through Farmer Field Schools. Bright Spots Demonstrate Community Successes. African Agriculture, 71-82.
Meijerink, G., & Roza, P. (2007). The Role of Agriculture in Development. Markets, Chains and Sustainable Development Strategy & Policy Papers. Free Electronic Distribution.
Mohammadzadeh, L., Sadighi, H., & Abbasi, E. (2017). Assessment of farmer-oriented Agricultural Extension Intervention in Iran. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 23 (2): 175-187. DOI: 10.1080/1389224X.2016.1242429.
Rathore, S., Intodia, S. L., & Singh, R. P. (2016). Analysis of Research–Extension–Farmer Linkage in the Arid Zone Of India. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education8(3), 69-72.‏
Rivera, W. M., & Sulaiman, V. R. (2009). Extension: Object of Reform, Engine for Innovation. Outlook on agriculture, 38(3): 267-273.‏
Rizal, R. (2010). Effect of Integrated Pest Management Farmer Field School (IPMFFS) on Farmer’s Knowledge, Farmers Group’s Ability, Process of Adoption and Diffusion of IPM in Jember District. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development, 2(2), 29-35.
Swanson, B. & Rajalahti, R. (2010). Strengthening Agricultural Extension and Advisory Systems: Procedures for Assessing, Transforming, and Evaluating Extension Systems”. Agriculture and Rural Development Discussion Paper 44, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/the World Bank, Washington.
Speranza, I. C., Kiteme, B. & Opondo, M. (2009). Adapting Public Agricultural Extension Services to Climate Change: Insights from Kenya. Paper presented in the Amsterdam Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change, 2-4 December.
  Schut, M.(2006). A House Does Not Make A Home: Challenging Paradigms Through Farmer Field Schools. MSc. Thesis, Communication and Innovation Studies. Department of Communication and Innovation Studies, Wageningen University.
Verschoor, A., Morrissey, O., Mosley, P., & Gomanee, K. (2005). Aid, Government Expenditure, and Aggregate Welfare. World Development, 33(3), 355-370.‏