پژوهش مدیریت آموزش کشاورزی

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

نگاشت‌شناختی فازی چالش‌های نظام دانش و نوآوری کشاورزی در تولید محصولات سبز استان همدان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه بو علی سینا

2 گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه بو علی سینا، همدان، ایران

10.22092/jaear.2026.371158.2082

چکیده

با توجه به پیامدهای منفی ناشی از مصرف بی‌رویه نهاده‌های شیمیایی در کشاورزی رایج و اهمّیت حفظ سلامت انسان و محیط‌زیست، تولید محصولات سبز یکی از اصلی‌ترین راهکارهای کشاورزی پایدار است. نظام دانش و نوآوری کشاورزی با توسعه ظرفیت‌های نوآوری فرصتی برای افزایش انعطاف‌پذیری کشاورزان در برابر تغییرات محیط‌زیست، تقویت بخش کشاورزی به عنوان مهم‌ترین بخش در افزایش تولید محصولات کشاورزی و تامین امنیت غذایی را فراهم می‌کند. با توجه به اهمّیت موضوع پژوهش حاضر با هدف شناسایی چالش‌ها و موانع نظام دانش و نوآوری کشاورزی در تولید محصولات سبز در استان همدان انجام گرفت. پژوهش حاضر از نوع پژوهش کاربردی است و از نظر دیدمان، آمیخته (کیفی- کمی) از نوع اکتشافی محسوب می‌شود. در این مطالعه به منظور شناسایی چالش‌ها و موانع نظام دانش و نوآوری کشاورزی در استان همدان با 23 تن از خبرگان در حوزه کشاورزی اعم از کارشناسان، اساتید، مروجّان و مدیران مصاحبه نیمه ساختار یافته انجام شد. نمونه‌گیری خبرگان به صورت هدفمند و از نوع گلوله‌برفی انجام پذیرفت و مصاحبه‌ها تا رسیدن به اشباع نظری ادامه یافت. داده‌ها با استفاده از تحلیل محتوای قراردادی و نرم‌افزار MAXQDA مورد تحلیل قرار گرفت، و مفاهیم و مقوله‌های اصلی و فرعی مستقیماً از داده‌ها استخراج شد. در گام دوم برای کشف روابط بین عوامل استخراج شده، از روش نگاشت شناختی فازی استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد اصلی‌ترین موانع و چالش‌های نظام دانش و نوآوری کشاورزی در تولید محصولات سبز در استان همدان عبارت است از: موانع ساختاری و نهادی (759/0)، اقتصادی (735/0)، فناورانه (731/0)، آموزشی و آگاهی‌رسانی (722/0)، اجتماعی و فرهنگی (721/0) و اطلاع‌رسانی و ارتباطی (715/0). همچنین روابط هر مؤلفه با زیرمؤلفه‌های آن نیز مشخص شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Fuzzy cognitive mapping the challenges of the agricultural knowledge and innovation system in the production of green products in Hamedan province

نویسندگان [English]

  • Reza Movahedi 1
  • Mahboobeh Ataei-Asad 2
  • Saeed Karimi 2

1 Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University

2 Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agricultture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Considering the negative consequences of excessive use of chemical inputs in conventional agriculture and the importance of preserving human and environmental health, the production of green products is one of the main solutions for sustainable agriculture. The agricultural knowledge and innovation system, by developing innovation capacities, provides an opportunity to increase farmers' resilience to environmental changes, strengthen the agricultural sector as the most important sector in increasing agricultural production and ensuring food security. Considering the importance of the subject, the present study was conducted with the aim of identifying the challenges and obstacles of the agricultural knowledge and innovation system in the production of green products in Hamedan province. The present study is an applied research and in terms of methodology, has used a mixed research (qualitative-quantitative). In this study, in order to identify the challenges and obstacles of the agricultural knowledge and innovation system in Hamedan province, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 23 experts in the field of agriculture, including experts, professors, extension agents, and managers. The experts were purposefully selected using snowball sampling, and the interviews continued until theoretical saturation was reached. The data were analyzed using conventional content analysis and MAXQDA software. The main and sub-categories and concepts were extracted directly from the data. In the second step, the fuzzy Delphi method was used to discover the relationships between the extracted factors. The results showed that the main obstacles and challenges of the agricultural knowledge and innovation system in the production of green products in Hamedan province are: structural and institutional obstacles (0.759), economic obstacles (0.735), technological obstacles (0.731), educational and awareness obstacles (0.722), social and cultural obstacles (0.721), and information and communication obstacles (0.715). The relationships of each component with its sub-components were also determined.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Knowledge and innovation system
  • sustainable agriculture
  • extension and education
  • production of green products
مراجع
اسدی، ع؛ اکبری، م؛ شریف‌زاده، م ش و علم‌بیگی، الف. (1393). رویکرد سیستمی در ترویج و توسعه کشاورزی با تأکید برنظام دانش و اطلاعات کشاورزی. انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی.
آل‌عمران، ر و آل‌عمران، ع. (1400). بررسی عوامل اقتصادی موثر بر ارزش افزوده بخش کشاورزی ایران. مجله تحقیقات اقتصاد کشاورزی. (1)13، 206-191.
پیرامون، ع؛ همایون، ب و غنیان،م. (1403). اولویت بندی راهبردهای توسعه کشاورزی پایدار استان خوزستان: کاربرد روش فرآیند تحلیل شبکه‌ای. علوم ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی ایران. (2)20، 111-95.
جاودان، ل؛ رضائی،ر؛ صفا، ل و یوسفی، ع. (1403). تحلیل کیفی موانع و محدودیت‌های فراوری تولید سیب‌زمینی سالم در استان زنجان. علوم ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی ایران. (1)20، 115-99.
دلاور، ع. (1403). روش تحقیق در روان شناسی و علوم تربیتی. انتشارات ویرایش. سبحانی، م ج و نوشاد، م.(1403). تأثیر راهبردهای فناورانه دانش‌بنیان بر عملکرد نوآورانه پایدار شرکت‌های صنایع غذایی استان خوزستان. علوم ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی ایران. (1) 20، 77-63.
شاکری بستان‌آبادی، ر؛ مهدیاراسماعیلی، م و صالحی کمرودی، م. (1400). تاب‌آوری اقتصادی بخش کشاورزی ایران. فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی تحقیقات اقتصاد کشاورزی. (4) 13، 59-41.
ظریفیان، ش؛ مصطفوی، س؛ یادآور، ح و شعبانعلی فمی، ح. (1402). تحلیل کارکردهای نظام نوآوری کشاورزی درتوسعه دانش بنیان بخش کشاورزی. مجله روستا و توسعه. (103)26، 51-29.
عثمان‌پور، م؛ رضائی، ر؛ اسکندری، ف و موموندی، ع. (1403). شناسایی موانع پیشروی نظام ترویج کشاورزی تکثرگرا در ایران. علوم ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی ایران. (2) 20، 28-1.
قزلباش، آ و صفا، ل. (1403). واکاوی عامل‌های بازدارنده توانمندسازی اقتصادی زنان روستایی(مورد مطالعه شهرستان طارم). علوم ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی ایران. (1)20، 211-193.
کردعلیوند، س؛ شعبانعلی فمی،ح؛ اسدی، ع و براتی، ع ا. (1402). تحلیل چالش‌ها و موانع صدور گواهی سلامت کشاورزی در ایران از دیدگاه کارشناسان. مجله علوم وترویج کشاورزی ایران. (1)19، 103-83.
کرسول، ج. (2017). پویش کیفی و طرح پژوهش. ترجمه کیامنش، انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی
 Alimirzaei, E., Hosseini, S. M., Hejazi, Y., and Movahed Mohammadi, H. (2019). Executive coherence in Iranian pluralistic agricultural extension and advisory system. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 21(3), 531-543.
Altieri , M.A & Nicholls, C.I. (2017). The adaptation and mitigation potential of traditional agriculture in a changing climate, Climatic Change 140, 33-45.
Appiah, B; Amponsah, I; Poudyal, A & Mensah, M. (2018). Identifying strengths and weaknesses of the integration of biomedical and herbal medicine units in Ghana using the WHO Health Systems Framework: a qualitative study. Journal of Complementary Medicine and Therapies, 18(286): 1-8.
Bai, Q; Zhenlei, X; Abhinav, U & Yangchao, L. (2024). Perspectives on sustainable food production system: Characteristics and green technologies. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 15, 100988.
Barrett, C.B. (2021). Overcoming global food security challenges through science and solidarity. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 103(2), 422-447. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/ajae.12160 Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, 8-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001
Bianco, A. (2016). Green Jobs and Policy Measures for a Sustainable Agriculture. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 8, 346-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.02.030
Cano, L. F., Zartha Sossa, J. W., Orozco Mendoza, G. L., Suárez Guzmán, L. M., Agudelo Tapasco, D. A., & Quintero Saavedra, J. I. (2023). Agricultural innovation system: analysis from the subsystems of R&D, training, extension, and sustainability. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7, 1176366.
Chen, Ch; Restuccia, D & Santaeulalia-Llopis. (2022). The effects of land markets on resource allocation and agricultural productivity. Review of Economic Dynamics, 45, 41-54. Conway,G. (2019).The Doubly Green Revolution: Food for All in the Twenty-First Century, Cornell University Press, New York.
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N., Leip, A.J.N.F.(2021). Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions. Nature Food 2 (3), 198–209. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00225-9
Danielsen, S; Mur, R; Kleijn, W & Wan, M. (2020). Assessing information sharing from plant clinics in China and Zambia through social network analysis. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 26(3):269-289
Dossou-Yovo,E.R; Arouna, A; Benfica, R; Mujawamariya & Yossa, R. (2024). A participatory framework for prioritizing climate-smart agriculture innovations in rice based systems: A case study of Mali. Smart Agricultural Technology 7, 100392.
Downe-Wamboldt, B. (1992). Content analysis: Method, applications, and issues. Health Care for Women International, 13(3), 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399339209516006
Dranka, G.G; Ferreira, P & Vaz, A.I.V. ( 2021).A review of co-optimization approaches for operational and planning problems in the energy sector, Appl. Energy 304,117703.
Drapal, J, HannesWestermann, H & Savelka, J. (2023). Using Large Language Models to Support Thematic Analysis in Empirical Legal Studies. doi:10.3233/FAIA230965
Edwards, C.A. (2020).The Importance of Integration in Sustainable Agricultural Systems, Sustainable Agricultural Systems, CRC Press, pp. 249–264.
El Bilali, H; Callenius, C; Strassner, C & Probst, L.(2019). Food and nutrition security and sustainability transitions in food systems, Food Energy Secur. 8, e00154.
Erlingsson, Ch & Brysiewicz, P. (2017). A hands-on guide to doing content analysis. African Journal of Emergency Medicine. Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages 93-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2017.08.001 Evans, D.L; Falagán, N; Hardman, C.A & et al. (2022).
Ecosystem service delivery by urban agriculture and green infrastructure – a systematic review. Ecosystem Services, 54, 101405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101405 FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), 2022. Assessment Metrics for Agricultural Innovation Systems (AIS) and Extension and Advisory Services (EAS). Technical Workshop Report, 18–20 November. Rome. https://www. fao.org/3/cb7913en/cb7913en.pdf.
Gaitán-Cremaschi, D; Klerkx, L; Aguilar-Gallegos, N; Duncan, J; Pizzolón, A; Dogliotti, S & Rossing, W.A. (2022). Public food procurement from family farming: a food system and social network perspective. Food Policy, 111, 102325. Guba, E.G & Lincoln, Y.(1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury
Park, CA: Sage Guo, A., Wei, X., Zhong, F., Wang, P., Song, X. (2022). Does cognition of resources and theenvironment affect farmers’ production efficiency? Study of oasis agriculture in China. Agriculture 12 (5), 592.
Hakio, K & Mattelm¨aki, T. (2019). Future skills of design for sustainability: an awareness-based co-creation approach, Sustainability, 11, 5247.
Hall, A., Dijkman, J., 2019. Public Agricultural Research and Development in an Era of Transformation Independent Science Council of the CGIAR and Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation.
Hebinck, A; Klerkx, L; Elzen, B; KoK, K; Konig, B; Schiller, K & et al.(2021). Beyond food for thought – Directing sustainability transitions research to address fundamental change in agri-food systems. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 41, 81-85.
Hermans, F; Sartas, M; Schagen, B.V& Asten, P.V. (2017). Social network analysis of multi-stakeholder platforms in agricultural research for development: Opportunities and constraints for innovation and scaling. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169634
Herrero, M., Thornton, P.K., Mason-D’Croz, D., Palmer, J., Benton, T.G., Bodirsky, B.L & et al. 2020. Innovation can accel-erate the transition towards a sustainable food system. Nature Food 1, 266–272. Higashida, M. (2024). An inductive content analysis of international social welfare syllabi at national and public universities in Japan: Towards a glocal subject design. Social Work Education, 43:2, 424-441, DOI: 10.1080/02615479.2022.2107194
Iram, N; Kavehei, E Maher, D.E; Bunn, S.E; Rezaei Rashti, M; Farahani, B.S & Adame, F.S. (2021). Soil greenhouse gas fluxes from tropical coastal wetlands and alternative agricultural land uses, Biogeosciences 18,5085–5096.
Klerkx, L., Begemann, S. (2022). Supporting food systems transformation: the what, why, who, where and how of mission-oriented agricultural innovation systems. Agric.Syst. 184, 102901 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102901.
Kunadhamraks, P. & Hanaoka, S. (2008). "Evaluating the logistics performance of intermodal transportation in Thailand". Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 20 (3), 323 – 342.
Klerkx, L., Rose, D. (2020). Dealing with the game-changing technologies of agriculture 4.0: how do we manage diversity and responsibility in food system transition path- ways? Global. Food Security 24, 100347
Kyngäs, H. (2020). Inductive content analysis. In H. Kyngäs, K. Mikkonen, & M. Kääriäinen (Eds.), The application of content analysis in nursing science research (pp. 13–21).
Lankoski, J. & Lankoski, L.(2023). Environmental sustainability in agriculture: Identification of bottlenecks. Ecological Economics. Volume 204,107656.
Li, E; Zhang, M; Li, R & Deng, Q. (2023). Influencing Factors and Improvement Suggestions for Agricultural Green Development Performance: Empirical Insights from China. Chinese Geographical Science, 33(5), 917-933.
Liamputtong, P. (2020). Qualitative research methods (5th ). Oxford University Press. Loki, O., Mudhara, M., and Pakela-Jezile, y. (2020). Factors influencing farmers' use of different extension services in the eastern cape and Kwazulu-Natal provinces of South Africa. South African Journal of Agricultural Extension (SAJAE), 48(1), 84-98. https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3221/2020/v48n1a528.
Lou, S., Zhang, B., Zhang, D. (2021). Foresight from the hometown of green tea in China: tea farmers’ adoption of pro-green control technology for tea plant pests. J. Clean. Prod. 320, 128817 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128817.
Luczka, W., and Kalinowski, S. (2020). Barriers to the development of organic farming: A polish case study. Agriculture, 10(11), 536. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10110536
Mallick, K., Sahana, M., & Chatterjee, S. (2023). Comparing Delphi–fuzzy AHP and fuzzy logic membership in soil fertility assessment: a study of an active Ganga Delta in Sundarban Biosphere Reserve, India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(55), 116688-116714.‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21983-4
Mao, H., Chai, Y., Chen, S. (2021). Land tenure and green production behavior: empirical analysis based on fertilizer use by cotton farmers in China. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18 (9), 4677. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094677
Markow, J; Fieldsend, A, Munchhausen, S & Haring, A.M. (2023). Building agricultural innovation capacity from the bottom up: Using spillover effects from projects to strengthen agricultural innovation systems. Agricultural Systems. 209, 103670
Mazzucato, M., Kattel, R., Ryan-Collins, J., 2020. Challenge-driven innovation policy: towards a new policy toolkit. J. Ind. Compet. Trade 20, 421–437.
Minh, T.T. (2019). Unpacking the systemic problems and blocking mechanisms of a regional agricultural innovation system: An integrated regional-functional-structural analysis. Agricultural Systems, 173, 268-280.
Mohanty, S & Swain, MR. (2019). Chapter 3 - Bioethanol Production From Corn and Wheat: Food, Fuel, and Future. Bioethanol Production from Food Crops Sustainable Sources, Interventions, and Challenges. Pages 45-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813766-6.00003-5
Moni, S.M; Mahmud, R; High, K & Carbajales-Dale, M. (2020). Life cycle assessment of emerging technologies: a review, J. Ind. Ecol. 24 , 52–63
Nettle, R; Crawford, A & Brightling, P. (2018). How private-sector farm advisors change their practices: An Australian case study. Journal of Rural Studies, 58, 20-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.12.027
Ni, L; Ahmad, F; Alshammari, T,O; Liang, H; Alsanie, Gh; Irshad, M & et al. (2023). The role of environmental regulation and green human capital towards sustainable development: The mediating role of green innovation and industry upgradation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 421, 138497. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), 2019. Innovation, Productivity and Sustainability in Food and Agriculture: Main Findings from Country Reviews and Policy Lessons. OECD Food and Agricultural Reviews. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c9c4ec1d-en
Pearce, DW; Markandya, A ; Barbier, E. (1989). Blueprint for a Green Economy: a report. Earthscan. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/39015804
Pigford, A.A.E., Hickeya, G.M. & Klerkx. L. (2018). Beyond agricultural innovation systems? Exploring an agricultural innovation ecosystems approach for niche design and development in sustainability transitions. Agricultural Systems, 164, 116-121.
Polit, F.D. and Beck, C.T. (2021). Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice. Open Journal of Nursing, Vol.14 No.8. Ravindra, Kh; Rattan, P; Moe, S & Aggarwal, A. (2019). Generalized additive models: Building evidence of air pollution, climate change and human health. Environment International, 132, 104987.
Rijswijk, K; Klerkx, L & Turner, J. (2019). Digitalisation in the New Zealand Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation System: Initial understandings and emerging organisational responses to digital agriculture. NJAS – Wageningen. Journal of Life Sciences, 90, 100313.
Romero-Riaño, E., Guarín-Manrique, L., Dueñas-Gómez, M. & Becerra-Ardila, L. (2019). Reference framework for capabilities development in agricultural innovation system. DYNA, 86(210), 23-34. Rose, N., Reeve, B., and Charlton, K. (2022). Barriers and enablers for healthy food systems and environments: The role of local governments. Current Nutrition Reports, 11(1), 82-93. https://doi.org/0.1007/s13668-022-00393-5.
Seijger, C., Hellegers, P., 2023. How do societies reform their agricultural water management towards new priorities for water, agriculture, and the environment? Agric. Water Manag. 277, 108104 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.108104.
Tran, T. H., Nguyen, P. H., & Nguyen, L. A. T. (2024, July). Strategic insights into post-harvest losses: a spherical fuzzy Delphi-DEMATEL investigation of the Vietnamese agricultural supply chain. In International Conference on Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems (pp. 360-372). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67192-0_42
Tubiello, F.N., Rosenzweig, C., Conchedda, G., Karl, K., Gütschow, J., Xueyao, P., et al., (2021). Greenhouse gas emissions from food systems: building the evidence base. Environ. Res. Lett. 16 (6), 065007 https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac018e.
Turner, J.A., Klerkx, L., White, T., Nelson, T., Everett-Hincks, J., Mackay, A., Botha, N., 2017. Unpacking systemic innovation capacity as strategic ambidexterity: how projects dynamically configure capabilities for agricultural innovation. Land Use Policy, 68, 503–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.054.
Vears, D. F & Gillam, L. (2022). Inductive content analysis: A guide for beginning qualitative researchers..Journal of Inductive content analysis, 23(1):111-127. https://doi.org/10.11157/fohpe.v23i1.544
Wang, J; Han, X; Lui, W ; Ni,Ch &Wu, Sh. (2024). Comprehensive assessment system and spatial difference analysis on development level of green sustainable agriculture based on life cycle and SA-PP model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 434, 139724.
World Bank. (2012). Knowledge assessment methodology. Available at: www.worldbank.org/kam. Wünsche, J.F & Fernqvist, F. (2022). The potential of blockchain technology in the transition towards sustainable food systems, Sustainability, 14 (13): 77-39.
Yamah, A. (2002).The practice of the system of rice intensification in SIERRA LEONE, in: Paper presented at the international conference on Assessments of the System of Rice Intensification (SRI), April 1 - 4, pp. 3–8.
Yew, M.H; Molla, A & Cooper, V. (2022). Behavioural and environmental sustainability determinants of residential energy management information systems use. Journal of Cleaner Production, 356, 131778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131778
Zhang, H; Zhang, J & Song, J. (2022). Analysis of the threshold effect of agricultural industrial agglomeration and industrial structure upgrading on sustainable agricultural development in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 3 41, 130818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130818.
پژوهش مدیریت آموزش کشاورزی
دوره 17، شماره 74 - شماره پیاپی 74
دی 1404
صفحه 40-59
فایل ها
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار